One of the best parts about being a lit major was that a significant portion of my grade came from answers that could be fudged. Some may call them BS answer; I call it using semantics to my advantage. After several degrees in this field, some might call me an expert in answering a question that you have no idea how to answer, but more importantly for me these days is my ability to spot the non-answer in my students’ work.
Lucky for me, I teach middle school. By the time they leave high school, students have learned how to play the game, what words to use to subconsciously persuade the teacher that they do know what they are taking about and aren’t just guessing blindly. It is MUCH easier for me to spot the kids who are winging it. They are starting to learn the tricks of the trade, but they have not mastered this craft.
On tests, I can often spot the non-answers to open-ended questions through their vagueness. Give an example of the theme “You must fight to survive.” “The main character fights through it all and in the end survives.” “This is shown in many parts of the book including when she fought to survive.” Nice try, but even the first-year teacher would recognize that as a big flashing, “I don’t know.”
Other times, the BS can be spotted because of the awkward and illogical response scribbled on the page. What is the symbol in this passage, and what does it represent? “The gray mist represents how maimed their passion was.” “His foot represents a new beginning.” (By the way, there was no mention of a foot in the passage I provided for this question.) Neither of those answers makes any sense. It wasn’t that you didn’t read the book the students are referencing; those answers make no sense because the students didn’t read it either.
But, my favorite non-answers to spot are the I-didn’t-study-vocab-but-I-will-wing-it vocabulary sentences. My school stresses knowledge of parts of speech, and it does come back to haunt me a little bit on vocab tests. Students write vague sentences with the word as the correct part of speech, and I get to determine if the sentence is BS or worth points. See if you can spot the kids who don’t know the meaning of the italicized word.
-The character was very frugal.
-The vermin was planning a plot of revenge.
-His legs were astride at the roll call.
–Indulgently, I helped the little boy onto the train.
-She was bewildered to find out about the good news.
None of these students earned credit, but there is a possibility that all of them studied and just weren’t sure how to properly use the word or that they were completely winging it. One day, they will be better at faking their way through a test, but for now, I usually win. I’ve added that to the list of reasons I love teaching middle school.